<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>scholarly communication &#8211; the scottbot irregular</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=scholarly-communication" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL</link>
	<description>data are everywhen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:18:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Submissions to DH2016 (pt. 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41533</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41533#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tl;dr Basic numbers on DH2016 submissions. Twice a year I indulge my meta-disciplinary sweet tooth: once to look at who&#8217;s submitting what to ADHO&#8217;s annual digital humanities conference, and once to look at which pieces get accepted (see the rest of the series). This post presents my first look at DH2016 conference submissions, the data for which I scraped [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41533</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Down the Rabbit Hole</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41397</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41397#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2015 01:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[miscellanea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WHEREIN I get angry at the internet and yell at it to get off my lawn. You know what&#8217;s cool? Ryan Cordell and friends&#8217; Viral Texts project. It tracks how 19th-century U.S. newspapers used to copy texts from each other, little snippets of news or information, and republish them in their own publications. A single snippet of [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41397</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 4)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41375</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41375#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 22:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tl;dr Women are (nearly but not quite) as likely as men to be accepted by peer reviewers at DH conferences, but names foreign to the US are less likely than either men or women to be accepted to these conferences. Some topics are more likely to be written on by women (gender, culture, teaching DH, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41375</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 3)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41355</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41355#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2015 07:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tl;dr There&#8217;s a disparity between gender diversity in authorship and attendance at DH2015; attendees are diverse, authors aren&#8217;t. That said, the geography of attendance is actually pretty encouraging this year. A lot of this work draws a project on the history of DH conferences I&#8217;m undertaking with the inimitable Nickoal Eichmann. She&#8217;s been integral on the research [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41355</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41347</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41347#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 23:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had enough yet? Too bad! Full-ahead into my analysis of DH2015, part of my 6,021-part series on DH conference submissions and acceptances. If you want more context, read the Acceptances to DH2015 part 1. tl;dr This post&#8217;s about the topical coverage of DH2015 in Australia. If you&#8217;re curious about how the landscape compares to previous [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41347</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41327</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41327#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Update!] Melissa Terras pointed out I probably made a mistake on 2015 long paper -&#62; short paper numbers. I checked, and she was right. I&#8217;ve updated the figures accordingly. tl;dr Part 1 is about sheer numbers of acceptances to DH2015 and comparisons with previous years. DH is still growing, but the conference locale likely prohibited [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41327</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Submissions to Digital Humanities 2015 (pt. 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41053</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41053#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you like the digital humanities? Me too! You better like it, because this is the 700th or so in a series of posts about our annual conference, and I can&#8217;t imagine why else you&#8217;d be reading it. My last post went into some summary statistics of submissions to DH2015, concluding in the end that [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41053</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Submissions to Digital Humanities 2015 (pt. 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41041</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41041#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 04:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time of the year again! The 2015 Digital Humanities conference will take place next summer in Australia, and as per usual, I&#8217;m going to summarize what is being submitted to the conference and, eventually, how those submissions become accepted. Each year reviewers get the chance to &#8220;bid&#8221; on conference submissions, and this lets us get [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41041</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2014 (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40695</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40695#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time again! The annual Digital Humanities conference schedule has been released, and this time it&#8217;s in Switzerland. In an effort to console myself from not having the funding to make it this year, I&#8217;ve gone ahead and analyzed the nitty-gritty of acceptances and rejections to the conference. For those interested in this sort [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=40695</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barriers to Scholarship &#038; Iterative Writing</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40622</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40622#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2014 16:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[miscellanea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is mostly just thinking out loud, musing about two related barriers to scholarship: a stigma related to self-plagiarism, and various copyright concerns. It includes a potential way to get past them. Self-Plagiarism When Jonah Lehrer&#8217;s plagiarism scandal first broke, it sounded a bit silly. Lehrer, it turned out, had taken some sentences he&#8217;d [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=40622</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
