<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>disciplinarity &#8211; the scottbot irregular</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=disciplinarity" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL</link>
	<description>data are everywhen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:18:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 4)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41375</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41375#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 22:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tl;dr Women are (nearly but not quite) as likely as men to be accepted by peer reviewers at DH conferences, but names foreign to the US are less likely than either men or women to be accepted to these conferences. Some topics are more likely to be written on by women (gender, culture, teaching DH, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41375</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do historians need scientists?</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40349</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40349#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two cultures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[edit: I&#8217;m realizing I didn&#8217;t make it clear in this post that I&#8217;m aware many historians consider themselves scientists, and that there&#8217;s plenty of scientific historical archaeology and anthropology. That&#8217;s exactly what I&#8217;m advocating there be more of, and more varied.] Short Answer: Yes. Less Snarky Answer: Historians need to be flexible to fresh methods, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=40349</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bridging Token and Type</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40088</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40088#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literary history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two cultures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an oft-spoken and somewhat strawman tale of how the digital humanities is bridging C.P. Snow&#8217;s &#8220;Two Culture&#8221; divide, between the sciences and the humanities. This story is sometimes true (it&#8217;s fun putting together Ocean&#8217;s Eleven-esque teams comprising every discipline needed to get the job done) and sometimes false (plenty of people on either side [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=40088</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Submissions to Digital Humanities 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39588</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39588#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Submissions for the 2014 Digital Humanities conference just closed. It&#8217;ll be in Switzerland this time around, which unfortunately means I won&#8217;t be able make it, but I&#8217;ll be eagerly following along from afar. Like last year, reviewers are allowed to preview the submitted abstracts. Also like last year, I&#8217;m going to be a reviewer, which [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=39588</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking the Ph.D. model using pretty pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39106</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39106#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[miscellanea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today, Heather Froehlich shared what&#8217;s at this point become a canonical illustration among Ph.D. students: &#8220;The Illustrated guide to a Ph.D.&#8221; The illustrator, Matt Might, describes the sum of human knowledge as a circle. As a child, you sit at the center of the circle, looking out in all directions. Eventually, he describes, you [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=39106</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An experiment in communal editing: Finding the history &#038; philosophy of science.</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=38424</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=38424#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citation analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=38424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After my last post about co-citation analysis, the author of one of the papers I was responding to, K. Brad Wray, generously commented and suggested I write up and publish the results and send them off to Erkenntnis, which is the same journal he published his results. That sounded like a great idea, so I am. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=38424</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2013 (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=35242</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=35242#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 01:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=35242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2013 Digital Humanities conference in Nebraska just released its program with a list of papers and participants. As some readers may recall, when the initial round of reviews went out for the conference, I tried my hand at analyzing submissions to DH2013. Now that the schedule has been released, the data available puts us [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=35242</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we bad social scientists?</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=106</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=106#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discourse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a recent slew of fantastic posts about critical theory and discourse in the digital humanities. To sum up: hacking, yacking, we need more of it, we already have enough of it thank you very much, just deal with the French names already, openness, data, Hope! The unabridged version is available for free [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=106</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bridging the gap</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=190</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=190#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alt-ac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two cultures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Traditional disciplinary silos have always been useful fictions. They help us organize our research centers, our journals, our academies, and our lives. However much simplicity we gain from quickly and easily being able to place research X into box Y, however, is offset by the requirement of fitting research X into one and only one box Y. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=190</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
