<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>data analysis &#8211; the scottbot irregular</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=data-analysis" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL</link>
	<description>data are everywhen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:18:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Submissions to DH2016 (pt. 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41533</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41533#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tl;dr Basic numbers on DH2016 submissions. Twice a year I indulge my meta-disciplinary sweet tooth: once to look at who&#8217;s submitting what to ADHO&#8217;s annual digital humanities conference, and once to look at which pieces get accepted (see the rest of the series). This post presents my first look at DH2016 conference submissions, the data for which I scraped [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41533</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work with me! CMU is hiring a DH Developer</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41520</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41520#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[miscellanea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carnegie Mellon University is hiring a DH Developer! I&#8217;ve had a blast since starting as Digital Humanities Specialist at CMU. Enough administrators, faculty, and students are on board to make building a DH strength here pretty easy, and we&#8217;re neighbors to Pitt DHRX, a really supportive supercomputing center, and great allies in the Mayor&#8217;s Office [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41520</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Counted Counts</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41425</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41425#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[miscellanea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tl;dr. Don&#8217;t rely on data to fix the world&#8217;s injustices. An unusually self-reflective and self-indulgent post. [Edit: this question was prompted by a series of analyses and visualizations I&#8217;ve done in collaboration with Nickoal Eichmann, but I purposefully left her out of the majority of this post, as it was one of self-reflection about my own [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41425</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 4)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41375</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41375#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 22:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tl;dr Women are (nearly but not quite) as likely as men to be accepted by peer reviewers at DH conferences, but names foreign to the US are less likely than either men or women to be accepted to these conferences. Some topics are more likely to be written on by women (gender, culture, teaching DH, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41375</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 3)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41355</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41355#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2015 07:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tl;dr There&#8217;s a disparity between gender diversity in authorship and attendance at DH2015; attendees are diverse, authors aren&#8217;t. That said, the geography of attendance is actually pretty encouraging this year. A lot of this work draws a project on the history of DH conferences I&#8217;m undertaking with the inimitable Nickoal Eichmann. She&#8217;s been integral on the research [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41355</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41347</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41347#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 23:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had enough yet? Too bad! Full-ahead into my analysis of DH2015, part of my 6,021-part series on DH conference submissions and acceptances. If you want more context, read the Acceptances to DH2015 part 1. tl;dr This post&#8217;s about the topical coverage of DH2015 in Australia. If you&#8217;re curious about how the landscape compares to previous [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41347</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41327</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41327#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhconf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Update!] Melissa Terras pointed out I probably made a mistake on 2015 long paper -&#62; short paper numbers. I checked, and she was right. I&#8217;ve updated the figures accordingly. tl;dr Part 1 is about sheer numbers of acceptances to DH2015 and comparisons with previous years. DH is still growing, but the conference locale likely prohibited [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41327</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Enough Perspectives, Pt. 1</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41271</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41271#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literary history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroanalysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right now DH is all texts, but not enough perspectives. &#8211;Andrew Piper Summary: Digital Humanities suffers from a lack of perspectives in two ways: we need to focus more on the perspectives of those who interact with the cultural objects we study, and we need more outside academic perspectives. In Part 1, I cover Russian Formalism, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41271</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Culturomics 2: The Search for More Money</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41200</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41200#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 21:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;God willing, we&#8217;ll all meet again in Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money.&#8221; -Mel Brooks, Spaceballs, 1987 A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away (2012 CE, Indiana), I wrote a few blog posts explaining that, when writing history, it might be good to talk to historians (1,2,3). They were popular posts for the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41200</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Networks Demystified 9: Bimodal Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41158</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41158#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gephi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks demystified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think, is a year long enough to wait between Networks Demystified posts? I don&#8217;t think so, which is why it&#8217;s been a year and a month. Welcome back! A recent twitter back-and-forth culminated in a request for a discussion of &#8220;bimodal networks&#8221;, and my Networks Demystified series seemed like a perfect place for just [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41158</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
