<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>complexity &#8211; the scottbot irregular</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=complexity" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL</link>
	<description>data are everywhen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:18:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Networks Demystified 9: Bimodal Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41158</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41158#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gephi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks demystified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think, is a year long enough to wait between Networks Demystified posts? I don&#8217;t think so, which is why it&#8217;s been a year and a month. Welcome back! A recent twitter back-and-forth culminated in a request for a discussion of &#8220;bimodal networks&#8221;, and my Networks Demystified series seemed like a perfect place for just [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41158</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital History, Saturn&#8217;s Rings, and the Battle of Trafalgar</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41109</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41109#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History and astronomy are a lot alike. When people claim history couldn&#8217;t possibly be scientific, because how can you do science without direct experimentation, astronomy should be used as an immediate counterexample. Astronomers and historians both view their subjects from great distances; too far to send instruments for direct measurement and experimentation. Things have changed a bit [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41109</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The moral role of DH in a data-driven world</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40944</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40944#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[miscellanea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the transcript from my closing keynote address at the 2014 DH Forum in Lawrence, Kansas. It&#8217;s the result of my conflicted feelings on the recent Facebook emotional contagion controversy, and despite my earlier tweets, I conclude the study was important and valuable specifically because it was so controversial. For the non-Digital-Humanities (DH) crowd, a quick glossary. Distant Reading [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=40944</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bridging Token and Type</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40088</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40088#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literary history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two cultures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an oft-spoken and somewhat strawman tale of how the digital humanities is bridging C.P. Snow&#8217;s &#8220;Two Culture&#8221; divide, between the sciences and the humanities. This story is sometimes true (it&#8217;s fun putting together Ocean&#8217;s Eleven-esque teams comprising every discipline needed to get the job done) and sometimes false (plenty of people on either side [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=40088</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Networks Demystified 8: When Networks are Inappropriate</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39600</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39600#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 22:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodological critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks demystified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few hundred years ago, I promised to talk about when not to use networks, or when networks are used improperly. With The Historian&#8217;s Macroscope in the works, I&#8217;ve decided to finally start answering that question, and this Networks Demystified is my first attempt at doing so. If you&#8217;re new here, this is part of [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=39600</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historians, Doctors, and their Absence</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39494</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39494#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Note: sorry for the lack of polish on the post compared to others. This was hastily written before a day of international travel. Take it with however many grains of salt seem appropriate under the circumstances.] [Author&#8217;s note two: Whoops! Never included the link to the article. Here it is.] Every once in a while, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=39494</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking the Ph.D. model using pretty pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39106</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39106#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[miscellanea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today, Heather Froehlich shared what&#8217;s at this point become a canonical illustration among Ph.D. students: &#8220;The Illustrated guide to a Ph.D.&#8221; The illustrator, Matt Might, describes the sum of human knowledge as a circle. As a child, you sit at the center of the circle, looking out in all directions. Eventually, he describes, you [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=39106</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting victors in an attention and feedback economy</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=23676</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=23676#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=23676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is about computer models and how they relate to historical research, even though it might not seem like it at first. Or at second. Or third. But I encourage anyone who likes history and models to stick with it, because it gets to a distinction of model use that isn&#8217;t made frequently enough. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=23676</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Simplicity</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=21129</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=21129#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=21129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can build complex arguments on a very simple foundation &#8211;Ted Underwood Celestial Navigation The world is full of very complex algorithms honed to solve even more complex problems. When you use your phone as a GPS, it&#8217;s not a simple matter of triangulating signals from towers or satellites. Because your GPS receiver has to [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=21129</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science Systems Engineering</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=13199</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=13199#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=13199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Warning: This post is potentially evil, and definitely normative. While I am unsure whether what I describe below should be done, I&#8217;m becoming increasingly certain that it could be. Read with caution. Complex Adaptive Systems Science is a complex adaptive system. It is a constantly evolving network of people and ideas and artifacts which interact with and feed back on each [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=13199</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
