Comments on: Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 2)

By: Gender Distribution and Gender Equality in German Literature Studies Journals – Part 1 | Annika Rockenberger

Sun, 06 Sep 2015 15:13:52 +0000

[…] or the DH community in general (see Scott Weingart’s series of blog posts (parts 1, 2, 3, and 4) on this matter), I will take a look at my own discipline, which is German literature […]

By: Why I do not trust Frontiers journals, especially not @FrontDigitalHum | Melissa Terras

Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:46:06 +0000

[…] you dont understand why this is problematic? When 46% of the 500+ attendees to DH2015 audience were women? When DH is has plenty of knowledgeable women around, when four out of the last […]

By: Where is the pedagogy in digital art history? | Smarthistory

Where is the pedagogy in digital art history? | Smarthistory — Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:37:38 +0000

[…] not unusual; the emphasis in the digital humanities has also been almost exclusively on research. One study by Scott Weingart found that “DH peer reviewers or editors are more unlikely to accept […]

By: Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 4) – the scottbot irregular

Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 4) – the scottbot irregular — Mon, 29 Jun 2015 20:51:58 +0000

[…] looking at diversity in Digital Humanities conferences, drawing especially on these two posts (1, 2) about topic, gender, and acceptance […]

By: Prof. Janni Aragon

Prof. Janni Aragon — Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:55:29 +0000

Wow. I wish I could say that I am surprised. Thanks for sharing this.

By: Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 3) – the scottbot irregular

Acceptances to Digital Humanities 2015 (part 3) – the scottbot irregular — Sat, 27 Jun 2015 07:12:06 +0000

[…] year’s international Digital Humanities conference being held in Sydney, Australia (part 1, part 2). This is the 10th post in a series of reflective entries on Digital Humanities conferences, […]