<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>reviews &#8211; the scottbot irregular</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=58" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL</link>
	<description>data are everywhen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:18:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Culturomics 2: The Search for More Money</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41200</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41200#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 21:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=41200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;God willing, we&#8217;ll all meet again in Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money.&#8221; -Mel Brooks, Spaceballs, 1987 A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away (2012 CE, Indiana), I wrote a few blog posts explaining that, when writing history, it might be good to talk to historians (1,2,3). They were popular posts for the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41200</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[Review] The Book of Trees, Manuel Lima</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40711</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40711#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=40711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first line on the first page of The Book of Trees is &#8220;This is the book I wish had been available when I was researching my previous book, Visual Complexity: Mapping Patterns of Information.&#8221; It&#8217;s funny, because this is also the book I wish had been available when I was researching my own project, Knowledge Uprooted. It took [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=40711</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historians, Doctors, and their Absence</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39494</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39494#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=39494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Note: sorry for the lack of polish on the post compared to others. This was hastily written before a day of international travel. Take it with however many grains of salt seem appropriate under the circumstances.] [Author&#8217;s note two: Whoops! Never included the link to the article. Here it is.] Every once in a while, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=39494</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liveblogged Review of Macroanalysis by Matthew L. Jockers, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=34775</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=34775#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literary history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=34775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got Matthew L. Jocker&#8217;s Macroanalysis in the mail, and I&#8217;m excited enough about it to liveblog my review. Here&#8217;s the review of part II (Analysis), chapter 5 (metadata). Read Part 1, Part 3, &#8230; Part II: Analysis Part II of Macroanalysis moves from framing the discussion to presenting a series of case studies around a theme, starting [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=34775</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liveblogged Review of Macroanalysis by Matthew L. Jockers, Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=34566</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=34566#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literary history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=34566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got Matthew L. Jocker&#8217;s Macroanalysis in the mail, and I&#8217;m excited enough about it to liveblog my review. Here&#8217;s my review of part I (Foundation), all chapters. Read Part 2, Part 3, &#8230; Macroanalysis: Digital Methods &#38; Literary History is a book whose time has come. &#8220;Individual creativity,&#8221; Matthew L. Jockers writes, &#8220;is highly [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=34566</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Defense of Collaboration</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=25401</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=25401#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=25401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a very round-about review of the new work of fiction by Robin Sloan, Mr. Penumbra&#8217;s 24-Hour Bookstore. Ship&#8217;s Logs and Collaborative DH Ben Schmidt has stolen the limelight of the recent digital humanities blogosphere, writing a phenomenal series of not one, not two, not three, not four, not five, not six, but seven posts about [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=25401</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Maps for the Ancient World</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=21923</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=21923#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=21923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title of this post comes from an oft-quoted passage of my previous one describing ORBIS, a scholarly argument cleverly disguised as a web tool. Of ORBIS I wrote &#8230;given any two cities in the ancient world, it returns the fastest, cheapest, or shortest route between them, given the month, the mode of transportation, and [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=21923</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ORBIS: The next step in Digital Humanities</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=15585</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=15585#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=15585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every once in a while, a new project comes around bearing a message loud and clear: this is a sign of things to come. ORBIS, the Stanford Geospatial Network Model of the Roman World, is one such project. ORBIS was created by Walter Scheidel, Elijah Meeks, and a host of others. At the very beginning, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=15585</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More heavy-handed culturomics</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=12364</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=12364#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culturomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=12364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago, Gao, Hu, Mao, and Perc posted a preprint of their forthcoming article comparing social and natural phenomena. The authors, apparently all engineers and physicists, use the google ngrams data to come to the conclusion that &#8220;social and natural phenomena are governed by fundamentally different processes.&#8221; The take-home message is that words describing [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=12364</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Modern Letters Online</title>
		<link>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=9584</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=9584#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Weingart]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gephi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republic of letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=9584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early modern history! Science! Letters! Data! Four of my favoritest things have been combined in this brand new beta release of Early Modern Letters Online from Oxford University. Summary EMLO (what an adorable acronym, I kind of what to tickle it) is Oxford&#8217;s answer to a metadata database (metadatabase?) of, you guessed it, early modern [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?feed=rss2&#038;p=9584</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
